The CampChuck Reviewer

the current distraction of startlets.com

Movie reviews

Film Festivals

Previous Wild and Scenic

Previous Nev. City Fests.

Oscar newsletter

And Then There Were Nine

Top Nine of 2011 84th

Getting Personal

wild and scenic 10th awar

Taking It in Short Shorts

Buck

California Forever

Food Stamped

Grow

Just Do It

Last Mountain The

Poppys Promise

Schooling the World

Sekem Vision - Portrait

Tramping in Bohemia

Windfall

Towers of the Ennedi

Rock the Boat

Cold

Marion Stoddart

Mono Lake Story The

One Ocean The Changing Se

With My Own Two Wheels

Into Eternity

Meet the Beetle

Someplace with a Mountain

We Still Live Here

homelesswoman-othervoices

9000 Needles

sussberg-kackbrice

Freedom Riders

manufacturemailbagness

Poetry in the newsletters

archived ManufacturedMail

Letters from "a friend"

CC or Newsletter related

Movie or Actor specific

Sort-of Movie Related

Miscellaneous Letters

Where letters came from

Mailbag Historical Notes

statistics

Oh See Can You Say

Old newsletters

Startlets

Photos

Snowbird Arizona 2011

Carbon Nation

The film “Carbon Nation” emphasizes a small number: 16.  What’s the 16?  The 16 is watts.  Actually, the 16 is terawatts.  What’s a terawatt?  Just remember we only need 16 of them per day to run the whole planet.

 

“Carbon Nation” explains that the Earth generates 32 terawatts every day in geothermal energy.  It experiences 870 every day of wind energy.  We only need 16.  The Earth receives 86,000 every day of solar energy.  We only need 16.  None of these resources will get used up like carbon-based energy.  None of these cost what carbon-based energy really costs, not if you factor-in toxic and suchlike hazards and resource depletions, and that global warming deal. 

 

Corporations don’t pay for the side effects of what they produce.  They “externalize costs.”  Learn more about that term.

 

Curiously, we wouldn’t even need 16 if we found satisfaction, that is, if we cashed in on the savings of not wasting energy.  Beyond curious, we seem to ignore any economic construct that inspires satisfaction traction around consuming less.

 

“Carbon Nation” wraps our arms around how much our carbon economy dominates the true cost equation.  It spends much of its feature length outlining ways to better address the energy number that sustains modern life.